In Re Peterman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Hyman is inapplicable where the debtors listed specific values of their property, “and the value of the property and the value of the exemption claimed were the same.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Cormier
  W.D. Michigan· 2008-02-14· cited 34×
• In re: Greg Anderson v.
  Sixth Circuit· 2007-11-07

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz
  Supreme Court· 1992-04-21· cited 949×
• In Re Irwin Hyman Janice Hyman, Debtors. Irwin Hyman Janice Hyman v. Gary A. Plotkin, Trustee
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-06-22· cited 157×
• Robert Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz Wendell G. Freeland Richard F. Kronz
  Third Circuit· 1991-07-08· cited 72×
• Hyman v. Plotkin (In Re Hyman)
  Ninth Circuit· 1991-02-12· cited 53×
• Bankr. L. Rep. P 76,098 in Re Lois Imogene Green, A/K/A Imogene Mason Green, Debtor. Robert Allen v. Lois Imogene Green, A/K/A Imogene Mason Green
  Eleventh Circuit· 1994-09-13· cited 51×
• In Re Walsh
  District of Columbia· 1980-07-11· cited 31×
• Matter of Wiesner
  W.D. Wisconsin· 1984-06-26· cited 19×
• In Re Shelby
  W.D. Missouri· 1999-03-30· cited 18×
• Morgan-Busby v. Gladstone (In Re Morgan-Busby)
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-01-07· cited 15×
• In Re Harrington
  E.D. Texas· 2003-12-29· cited 10×
• Zupansic v. Hyman (In Re Zupansic)
  M.D. Florida· 2001-03-05· cited 5×