Skip to main content
· 1/7/2002

Morgan-Busby v. Gladstone (In Re Morgan-Busby)

Citations

  • 272 B.R. 257
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 1002
  • 47 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1079
  • 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 593
  • 2002 Bankr. LEXIS 38
  • 38 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 265
  • 2002 WL 99547

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Allowing a trustee to distinguish between an objection to an exemption itself and the value of the property subject to that exemption does not promote finality.”
  • “Allowing a trustee to distinguish between an objection to an exemption itself and the value of the property subject to that exemption does not promote finality.”
  • “Taylor made it clear that the purpose for the short objection period in Rule 4003(b
  • “Taylor made it clear that the purpose for the short 16 objection period in Rule 4003(b
  • ambiguous 16 exemptions are not subject to Rule 4003(b)
  • interpreting the debtors’ internally inconsistent schedules against the debtors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ryan, Brandt, Marlar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.