· 1/7/2002
Morgan-Busby v. Gladstone (In Re Morgan-Busby)
Citations
- 272 B.R. 257
- 2002 Daily Journal DAR 1002
- 47 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1079
- 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 593
- 2002 Bankr. LEXIS 38
- 38 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 265
- 2002 WL 99547
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Allowing a trustee to distinguish between an objection to an exemption itself and the value of the property subject to that exemption does not promote finality.”
- “Allowing a trustee to distinguish between an objection to an exemption itself and the value of the property subject to that exemption does not promote finality.”
- “Taylor made it clear that the purpose for the short objection period in Rule 4003(b
- “Taylor made it clear that the purpose for the short 16 objection period in Rule 4003(b
- ambiguous 16 exemptions are not subject to Rule 4003(b)
- interpreting the debtors’ internally inconsistent schedules against the debtors
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ryan, Brandt, Marlar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.