In Re Payroll Exp. Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “No affidavits or new material may be submitted, because ‘such a motion is limited to the record that was before the Court on the original motion.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay
  Supreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 3,269×
• Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 964×
• Paddington Partners v. Jean-Louis Bouchard, Herbert A. Denton, Econocom Finance Nv Econocom International N v. Jeffries & Company, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1994-08-22· cited 608×
• Advanced Magnetics, Inc. v. Bayfront Partners, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1997-01-13· cited 161×
• Harriscom Svenska Ab v. Harris Corporation
  Second Circuit· 1991-10-18· cited 152×
• Frank J. Ginett, Cross-Appellant v. Computer Task Group, Inc., Cross-Appellee
  Second Circuit· 1992-04-21· cited 139×
• Chappell & Co., Inc., T. B. Harms Company, Williamson Music, Inc., Frank Loesser and Frank Music Corp. v. J. Jay Frankel
  Second Circuit· 1966-10-13· cited 92×
• Morser v. AT & T INFORMATION SYSTEMS
  S.D. New York· 1989-06-06· cited 92×
• Anglo American Insurance Group, P.L.C. v. CalFed Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1996-09-06· cited 42×
• Ades v. Deloitte & Touche
  S.D. New York· 1994-02-07· cited 23×
• Jones v. Trump
  S.D. New York· 1997-07-11· cited 22×
• Frankel v. ICD Holdings S.A.
  S.D. New York· 1996-09-30· cited 15×
• Cohen v. Koenig
  S.D. New York· 1996-05-09· cited 10×
• Pereira v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. (In Re Payroll Express Corp.)
  S.D. New York· 1997-10-01· cited 9×
• Pereira v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
  S.D. New York· 1997-11-13· cited 4×