In re O.S.
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 5182
Syllabus
The juvenile court did not err or abuse its discretion in: (1) denying Father's second motion for a continuance when the case had been proceeding for multiple years; (2) granting legal custody to nonrelatives through the Department of Job and Family Services where the children successfully assimilated to the placement and where father, despite repeated efforts, continued to exhibit mental health and alcohol abuse issues that led to the children being removed from his care; and (3) gave Father two hours of weekly parental time and giving custodial family the ability to later increase parental time.
Judges: Siebert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re D.P.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-19· cited 37×
- In re G.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-29· cited 21×
- Ostigny v. BrubakerOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-02-05· cited 13×
- In re K.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-03-11· cited 9×
- In re A.M.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-22· cited 6×
- In re W.P.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-13· cited 2×
- Tinch v. SewardOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-19· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.