Skip to main content
· 9/20/2005

In Re: Optical Technologies, Inc. v. Larson Pharmacy Inc.

Citations

  • 425 F.3d 1294
  • 55 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 74
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 20095
  • 45 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 89
  • 2005 WL 2276420

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A]ppellants cannot raise objections to the actual terms of the Fourth 16 Amended Plan or the confirmation order, as these were deemed waived when they failed to object to confirmation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Roney, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.