· 9/20/2005
In Re: Optical Technologies, Inc. v. Larson Pharmacy Inc.
Citations
- 425 F.3d 1294
- 55 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 74
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 20095
- 45 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 89
- 2005 WL 2276420
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A]ppellants cannot raise objections to the actual terms of the Fourth 16 Amended Plan or the confirmation order, as these were deemed waived when they failed to object to confirmation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tjoflat, Roney, Hill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.