Enron Corp. v. The New Power Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a party’s “vote for or against a plan” may be applied “to a modified plan unless the modification materially and adversely changes” the party’s treatment
• applying a materiality standard to Bankruptcy Rule 3019 and citing to American Solar King

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).