Skip to main content
· 5/17/2007

Valley Historic Limited Partnership v. The Bank of New York

Citations

  • 486 F.3d 831
  • 58 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 166
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 11556
  • 48 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 67
  • 2007 WL 1439734

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the very purpose of bankruptcy is to discharge or restructure the debt that has caused the bankruptcy”
  • explaining that tortious interference claim by debtor against lender that was premised upon actions extraneous to the bankruptcy did not arise in debtor’s bankruptcy case
  • deciding even res judicata does not overcome a bankruptcy court’s obligation to determine its subject matter jurisdiction
  • noting that, in the context of a Chapter 11 proceeding, Section 1334(e) “creates exclusive jurisdiction over ‘property’ for a limited period of time—until confirmation and the property vests in the reorganized debtor”
  • explaining that “related to” jurisdiction is implicated if a civil action could alter the debtor’s rights and liabilities and impacts the administration of 19 USCA4 Appeal: 22-1135 Doc: 57 Filed: 06/20/2023 Pg: 20 of 47 the bankruptcy estate
  • explaining that “related to” jurisdiction is implicated if a civil action could alter the debtor’s rights and liabilities and impacts the administration of 19 USCA4 Appeal: 22-1127 Doc: 58 Filed: 06/20/2023 Pg: 20 of 47 the bankruptcy estate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shedd, Duncan, Wilson, Western, Virginia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.