Skip to main content

In re Nisley

Citations

  • 365 Or. 793
  • 453 P.3d 529

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court rejected lawyer’s proffered narrow reading of ambiguous statement, because surrounding context supported broader reading
  • court rejected lawyer’s proffered narrow reading of ambiguous statement, because surrounding context supported broader reading
  • court’s inquiry required determining the “intended mean- ing” of lawyer’s disputed statements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.