Skip to main content

In Re Lawrence

Citations

  • 98 P.3d 366
  • 337 Or. 450
  • 2004 Ore. LEXIS 676

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting lawyer’s proposed meaning of her statement as implausible, based on evidence in the record
  • considering delay as á mitigating circumstance where trial panel’s disciplinary decision was issued more than five years after the misconduct occurred
  • lawyer caused injury to the profession when she failed to be truthful with the Bar
  • based on other evidence, lawyer’s testimony about her intended meaning of a purportedly false statement was “implausible”
  • based on other evidence, lawyer’s testimony about her intended meaning of a purportedly false statement was “implausible”
  • from sur- rounding facts, lawyer had to have known that her misrep- resentation by omission had been essential to Bar’s assess- ment whether she had engaged in misconduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.