Skip to main content
· 9/26/1996

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Miles

Citations

  • 923 P.2d 1219
  • 324 Or. 218
  • 1996 Ore. LEXIS 97

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring the accused in that case to explain certain matters before being allowed to resume practice
  • reaching that conclusion in similar circumstances
  • failure to cooperate harmed the profession and the public “because, [the lawyer] delayed the Bar’s investigation and, consequently, the resolution of her clients’ complaints”
  • 120-day suspension appropriate when lawyer failed to respond to inquiries posed by Bar and LPRC in disciplinary investigation
  • 120-day suspension for failure to cooperate, noting that, “[i]n most cases, either a single, significant failure to cooperate with a disciplinary investigation or lesser, multiple failures to cooperate warrant a lengthy suspension from the practice of law”
  • accused lawyer’s receipt of certified letters from Bar supported finding of knowledge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.