Skip to main content
· 1/9/2001

In Re Nett Designs, Inc.

Citations

  • 236 F.3d 1339
  • 57 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1564
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 234
  • 2001 WL 15624

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding ULTIMATE BIKE RACK merely descriptive of “bicycle racks” despite the presence of “ultimate” without a disclaimer in other marks on the Principal Register
  • looking at applicant’s advertising brochures in connection with determining whether consumers would perceive mark as descriptive
  • finding little persuasive value Case: 22-1178 Document: 24 Page: 5 Filed: 06/10/2022 IN RE: A. ZETA S.R.L. 5 in similar registrations, which do not bind Board or this Court, since each mark must be reviewed on basis of appli- cation at issue
  • finding little persuasive value Case: 22-1178 Document: 24 Page: 5 Filed: 06/10/2022 IN RE: A. ZETA S.R.L. 5 in similar registrations, which do not bind Board or this Court, since each mark must be reviewed on basis of appli- cation at issue
  • “Any competent source suffices to show the relevant purchasing public’s understanding of a contested term or phrase.”
  • THE ULTIMATE BIKE RACK is “a laudatory descriptive phrase that touts the superiority of Nett Designs’ bike racks”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mayer, Rader, Bryson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.