Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Federal Circuit· 10/27/2005

In Re Stereotaxis, Inc.

Citations

  • 429 F.3d 1039
  • 77 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1087
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 23264
  • 2005 WL 2782544

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming TTAB’s finding that STER-EOTAXIS was descriptive of certain magnetic medical devices and services because it described their functions and purposes— performing the “stereotaxis” brain surgery technique
  • affirming refusal to register for failure to comply with a disclaimer requirement
  • “[Registration should be refused if the mark is descriptive of any of the goods for which registration is sought.”
  • “A descriptiveness refusal is proper “if the mark is descriptive of any of the [goods or services in the class] for which registration is sought.”
  • “A descriptiveness refusal is proper “if the mark is descriptive of any of the [goods or services in the class] for which registration is sought.”
  • “A descriptiveness refusal is proper “if the mark is descriptive of any of the [goods or services in the class] for which registration is sought.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rader, Friedman, Dyk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.