Skip to main content
· 6/10/1987

In Re Joseph Gyulay

Citations

  • 820 F.2d 1216
  • 3 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1009
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 330

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • When the Examining Attorney sets forth a prima facie case, the applicant cannot simply criticize the absence of additional evidence supporting the refusal and must come forward with evidence supporting its argument for registration.
  • When the Examining Attorney sets forth a prima facie case, the applicant cannot simply criticize the absence of additional evidence supporting the refusal, but must come forward with evidence supporting its argument for registration.
  • “Rebuttal evidence and argument are the applicant’s province.”
  • “Rebuttal evidence and argument are the applicant’s province.”
  • “Rebuttal evidence and argument are the applicant’s province.”
  • “Rebuttal evidence and argument are the applicant’s province.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Friedman, Newman, Archer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.