Skip to main content

In re N.D.

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 5779

Syllabus

Trial court did not err by adopting magistrate's decision denying motion to suppress because the juvenile voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waived his constitutional rights against self-incrimination and to counsel. Although the juvenile did not consult with a parent prior to waiving his rights, the totality of the circumstances demonstrated that the juvenile, who was 15 years old, understood his rights and did not expressly request to speak with one of his parents. Trial court did not err by adopting magistrate's decision adjudicating juvenile delinquent for having committed reckless homicide because the evidence was sufficient to establish that juvenile acted recklessly.

Judges: Dorrian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.