Supreme Court of Vermont· 12/11/1987
In Re Nash
Citations
- 539 A.2d 989
- 149 Vt. 63
- 1987 Vt. LEXIS 592
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that there was no abuse of discretion in admitting evidence where trial court considered the appropriate factors of unfair prejudice, the “probative value of the evidence [was] clear, and the unfairness of any claimed prejudice [was] not readily apparent”
- victim’s earlier knowledge that the defendant had a knife was sufficient to supply evidence of fear of imminent harm
- issues “were preserved at trial but not raised on his direct appeal”
- admissibility of evidence is addressed to discretion of trial judge
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Peck, Dooley, Mahady
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re CarterSupreme Court of Vermont· 2004-02-27· cited 74×
- State v. ShippeeSupreme Court of Vermont· 2003-11-05· cited 37×
- State v. DerouchieSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-10-20· cited 23×
- State v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-04-14· cited 19×
- State v. CardinalSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-11-30· cited 18×
- State v. ChenetteSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-03-10· cited 17×
- People v. CorbiereMichigan Court of Appeals· 1997-02-25· cited 16×
- In Re NashSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-06-21· cited 16×
- State v. RussoSupreme Court of Vermont· 2004-10-08· cited 15×
- State v. GoodnowSupreme Court of Vermont· 1994-05-27· cited 13×
- State v. HooperSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-12-16· cited 11×
- In re Laura HernandezSupreme Court of Vermont· 2021-09-03· cited 2×
- Ladabouche v. WaltonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-07-28· cited 1×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court· 1977-04-27· cited 4,812×
- Illinois v. VitaleSupreme Court· 1980-06-19· cited 1,215×
- State v. NashSupreme Court of Vermont· 1984-05-25· cited 50×
- State v. ForbesSupreme Court of Vermont· 1987-01-16· cited 30×
- State v. JarrettSupreme Court of Vermont· 1983-06-07· cited 15×
- Berard v. MoeykensSupreme Court of Vermont· 1974-10-01· cited 14×
- In re NashSupreme Court of Vermont· 1985-08-30· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.