Supreme Court of Vermont· 6/21/1991
In Re Nash
Citations
- 614 A.2d 367
- 158 Vt. 458
- 1991 Vt. LEXIS 238
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “trial court is entitled to draw reasonable inferences from the testimony it receives”
- providing “trial court is entitled to draw reasonable inference from the testimony it receives” in typical case because “court’s vantage point” allows it to see, hear, and observe witnesses who testify
- “The right to challenge a juror is waived by a failure to object before the jury is impaneled if the basis for the objection is known or might, with reasonable diligence, have been discovered during voir dire.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, C.J., and Peck, Gibson, Dooley and Morse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. KoveosSupreme Court of Vermont· 1999-02-05· cited 32×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-08-03· cited 27×
- First Nat. Bank of Biwabik, MN v. Bank of LemmonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1995-08-02· cited 26×
- State v. Jonathan BrunoSupreme Court of Vermont· 2012-10-05· cited 22×
- State v. Tommy Y., Jr.West Virginia Supreme Court· 2006-10-27· cited 21×
- State v. Gary Lee Schaefer Herald Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-09-13· cited 20×
- Pinewood Manor, Inc. v. Vermont Agency of TransportationSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-09-08· cited 14×
- Landmark Trust (USA), Inc. v. GoodhueSupreme Court of Vermont· 2001-09-21· cited 12×
- State v. MayoSupreme Court of Vermont· 2008-01-18· cited 11×
- MICHAEL POTH v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-12-29· cited 5×
- In re T.R.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1994-12-13· cited 5×
- McCormack v. Rutland Hospital, Inc. d/b/a Rutland Regional Medical Center and DiMuzioSupreme Court of Vermont· 2013-08-02· cited 1×
- In Re Joseph BruyetteSupreme Court of Vermont· 2026-05-22
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 11,658×
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 9,383×
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court· 1961-06-05· cited 3,697×
- McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court· 1984-01-18· cited 1,407×
- Amadeo v. ZantSupreme Court· 1988-05-31· cited 361×
- Mills Acquisition Co. v. MacMillan, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1989-05-03· cited 245×
- United States v. Paul C. PerkinsEleventh Circuit· 1984-12-19· cited 212×
- In Re RosierWashington Supreme Court· 1986-04-10· cited 191×
- Avondale on Hayden, Inc. v. HallIdaho Court of Appeals· 1983-02-02· cited 62×
- Highgate Associates, Ltd. v. MerryfieldSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-08-23· cited 62×
- In Re Quechee Lakes Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-07-13· cited 60×
- Commonwealth v. ShireySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-09-07· cited 52×
- State v. NashSupreme Court of Vermont· 1984-05-25· cited 50×
- Aussie L. ROBINSON, Appellant, v. MONSANTO COMPANY, AppelleeEighth Circuit· 1985-04-01· cited 46×
- Cliche v. ClicheSupreme Court of Vermont· 1983-09-06· cited 46×
- Ex Parte O'LearySupreme Court of Alabama· 1982-05-21· cited 41×
- Petition of Town of SherburneSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-07-20· cited 40×
- Semprebon v. SemprebonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-07-19· cited 33×
- State v. HohmanSupreme Court of Vermont· 1980-07-24· cited 33×
- Commonwealth v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-11-14· cited 32×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.