State v. Chenette

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying third-party consent doctrine where State retrieved defendant’s documents by consent of third-party managing them
• discussing prosecution’s argument that prior bad act evidence showed common scheme or plan
• where defendant’s files not kept in a special location, or under lock and key, custodian of records had apparent authority to consent to search and seizure
• where defendant's files not kept in a special location, or under lock and key, custodian of records had apparent authority to consent to search and seizure
• “While [the evidence] might have some prejudicial effect, the balancing was within the trial court’s discretion and the prejudice was minimized by the limiting instruction.”
• no abuse of discretion in denying motion for venue change where defendant claimed that he was notorious in community, that he had been subjected to negative press three years earlier on unrelated matters, and that there were news reports on accusations against him in his criminal case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).