E.D. New York· 9/18/1984
In Re Morton
Citations
- 43 B.R. 215
- 12 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 159
- 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 5002
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding section 506(a), which “provides for bifurcation of an allowed claim,” does not apply to an eligibility determination under section 109(e)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robert John Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re: James P. Slack, Debtor. James P. Slack v. Wilshire Insurance CompanyNinth Circuit· 1999-07-30· cited 63×
- In Re JonesE.D. Michigan· 1993-02-23· cited 43×
- Robert Miller v. United States of America, Acting Through the Farmers Home AdministrationEighth Circuit· 1990-07-03· cited 38×
- In Re TorontoD. Connecticut· 1994-03-31· cited 35×
- United States v. EdmonstonE.D. California· 1989-04-14· cited 24×
- Lamar v. United States (In Re Lamar)D. Nevada· 1990-02-26· cited 20×
- Matter of KoehlerD. Nebraska· 1986-01-06· cited 19×
- In Re RifkinE.D. New York· 1991-03-15· cited 19×
- In Re SlaterE.D. New York· 1996-09-21· cited 16×
- In Re McClaskieS.D. Ohio· 1988-10-07· cited 14×
- In Re ClarkD. Colorado· 1988-10-14· cited 13×
- In Re StroberE.D. New York· 1992-03-10· cited 12×
- In Re BosD. Montana· 1989-12-27· cited 11×
- In Re ProsperD. Connecticut· 1994-06-29· cited 11×
- Laws v. United Missouri Bank of Kansas City, NAW.D. Missouri· 1995-10-13· cited 9×
- Matter of VerdunnM.D. Florida· 1993-11-04· cited 9×
- In Re RigdonW.D. Missouri· 1988-12-22· cited 8×
- In re RiosD. Massachusetts· 2012-08-21· cited 8×
- Matter of JessenS.D. Iowa· 1988-01-29· cited 7×
- First Bank, National Ass'n v. Martin (In Re Martin)S.D. Iowa· 1987-09-29· cited 7×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court· 1939-12-04· cited 2,011×
- Heiser v. WoodruffSupreme Court· 1946-05-27· cited 428×
- Winters v. LavineSecond Circuit· 1978-01-16· cited 125×
- Saylor v. LindsleySecond Circuit· 1968-03-18· cited 88×
- In Re BallardE.D. Virginia· 1980-05-14· cited 40×
- Matter of FarrellE.D. New York· 1982-12-15· cited 36×
- In Re BobroffE.D. Pennsylvania· 1983-10-03· cited 20×
- In Re SotterS.D. New York· 1983-03-04· cited 11×
Other cases named In Re Morton
24 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- In Re MortonTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2010-02-22· cited 22×
- In re MortonSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2012-02-27· cited 11×
- In re MortonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2023-12-01· cited 7×
- In re MortonD. Massachusetts· 1902-12-09· cited 5×
- In Re MortonIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-07-08· cited 4×
- In re MortonIndiana Court of Appeals· 1922-11-21· cited 2×
- In re MortonFifth Circuit· 2012-02-13· cited 1×
- In re MortonLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2014-06-23
- In re MortonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2014-11-14
- In re MortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1919-12-15
- In re MortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1937-09-10
- In re MortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1939-11-22
- In re MortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1943-01-06
- In re MortonSupreme Court of Georgia· 1983-01-06
- In re MortonSupreme Court of Georgia· 1983-04-27
- In re MortonSupreme Court of Georgia· 1983-01-06
- In re MortonCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1931-05-27
- In re MortonSupreme Court· 2010-04-05
- In re MortonCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1965-03-04
- In re MortonIndiana Supreme Court· 1987-02-27
- In re MortonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2014-12-10
- In re MortonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2015-04-14
- In re MortonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2017-11-01
- In re MortonVeterans Claims· 2005-04-29
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.