Skip to main content

In Re Morton

Citations

  • 326 S.W.3d 634
  • 2010 WL 45866

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that fingerprint analysis cannot be compelled under article 64 7 of the Code of Criminal Procedure because it does not involve testing of biological material
  • finding a greater than 50% likelihood that jury would have had a reasonable doubt that movant was the murderer if a bandana contained victim's blood and DNA of another person
  • fIndtng denial of Motion for Testing to be appealable order when it is \obviously not interlo cutory. \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Waldrop, Henson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.