In re M.O.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that rules of statutory interpretation may be applied to interpret procedural rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Welfare of the Child of R.K.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2017-09-13· cited 19×
• In the Marriage of: Sarah Nicole Smith v. Jonathan George Smith
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2026-02-02

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re the Welfare of J.R.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-01-09· cited 63×
• State v. Barrett
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-04-21· cited 49×
• Hans Hagen Homes, Inc. v. City of Minnetrista
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-03-15· cited 47×
• Nguyen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-02-13· cited 33×
• Roehrdanz v. Brill
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-07-15· cited 28×
• O'BRIEN v. Wendt
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-07-03· cited 18×
• Heller v. Wolner
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-07-14· cited 15×
• Rieman v. Joubert
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-11-15· cited 13×
• Levine v. Hauser
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-11-15· cited 9×
• Curtis v. Curtis
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1989-06-27· cited 6×
• Duluth Ready-Mix Concrete, Inc. v. City of Duluth
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-08-30· cited 6×
• BROWN'S BAY MARINE CORPORATION v. Skrypec
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-07-09· cited 6×
• First Minnesota Bank v. Overby Development, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-06-15· cited 4×
• Niemi v. Girl Scouts of Minnesota & Wisconsin Lakes & Pines
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-07-14· cited 2×
• In re the Welfare of the Child of T.L.M.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2011-10-03· cited 2×