· 11/15/1988
Levine v. Hauser
Citations
- 431 N.W.2d 269
- 1988 Minn. App. LEXIS 1108
- 1988 WL 120347
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining “to reward counsel’s inattention” to the need to serve proper notice of filing by entering the debate of whether certain documents satisfied the requirements of a notice of filing
- requiring notice to call to recipient’s attention what was filed and when
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wozniak, Forsberg, Schumacher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.