Skip to main content
· 11/15/1988

Levine v. Hauser

Citations

  • 431 N.W.2d 269
  • 1988 Minn. App. LEXIS 1108
  • 1988 WL 120347

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining “to reward counsel’s inattention” to the need to serve proper notice of filing by entering the debate of whether certain documents satisfied the requirements of a notice of filing
  • requiring notice to call to recipient’s attention what was filed and when

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wozniak, Forsberg, Schumacher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.