In Re Hansen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Section 109(e) states plainly that eligibility to proceed under chapter 13 depends on what the debtor owes ‘on the date of the filing of the petition.’ Post- petition changes in what the debtor owes are therefore beside the point.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Tabor
  N.D. Illinois· 2018-04-11· cited 52×
• Schechter v. Hansen (In Re Hansen)
  N.D. Illinois· 2005-06-15· cited 21×
• In Re Kuhn
  N.D. Indiana· 2005-03-23· cited 11×
• In Re De La Hoz
  M.D. Florida· 2011-05-05· cited 8×
• In re Miller
  N.D. Illinois· 2013-05-21· cited 6×
• In re Ash
  E.D. Tennessee· 2015-10-29· cited 5×
• In Re Saunders
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-09-07· cited 4×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In the Matter of Timothy R. Pearson and Mary T. Pearson, Debtors. Comprehensive Accounting Corporation v. Timothy R. Pearson and Mary T. Pearson
  Sixth Circuit· 1985-10-09· cited 151×
• In Re: Arthur Lionel Scovis Jenny Scovis, Debtors. Arthur Lionel Scovis Jenny Scovis v. Christen Brun Henrichsen
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-05-11· cited 151×
• In re Kmart Corp.
  Seventh Circuit· 2004-02-24· cited 81×
• Craig Corp. v. Albano (In Re Albano)
  N.D. Illinois· 1985-11-07· cited 54×
• Copper v. Copper (In Re Copper)
  Sixth Circuit· 2004-09-24· cited 25×
• In Re Thornton
  S.D. Ohio· 1996-12-06· cited 21×
• Lucoski v. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Lucoski)
  S.D. Indiana· 1991-04-08· cited 20×
• In Re Oblinger
  N.D. Ohio· 2003-01-06· cited 14×
• In Re Sullivan
  N.D. Florida· 1999-09-28· cited 11×
• In Re Stairs
  D. Colorado· 2004-02-05· cited 10×
• In Re Newman
  M.D. Florida· 2001-03-05· cited 9×
• In Re Hatzenbuehler
  N.D. Texas· 2002-08-26· cited 9×
• In Re Rohl
  E.D. Michigan· 2003-09-03· cited 8×