Supreme Court of Connecticut· 11/27/2001
In re Michael S.
Citations
- 258 Conn. 621
- 784 A.2d 317
- 2001 Conn. LEXIS 482
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that No. 86-185, § 2, of 1986 Public Acts was enacted to overrule our decision in In re Juvenile Appeal [85-AB], 195 Conn. 303, 488 A.2d 778 [1985]
- legislature’s change to language of statutory provision in response to judicial decision interpreting that provision insufficient to overcome presumption against retroactive applicability
- “[i]n determining the effect of a subsequent statutory amendment on earlier legislation . . . [w]e recognize the usual presumption that, in enacting a statute, the legislature intended a change in existing law” [internal quotation marks omitted]
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-01-24· cited 153×
- State v. MirandaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-08-02· cited 48×
- Town of Branford v. BarbaraSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-02-16· cited 20×
- Town of Middlebury v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-07-17· cited 18×
- Blondeau v. BaltierraSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2020-09-24· cited 14×
- Weldy v. NORTHBROOK CONDOMINIUM ASS'N, INC.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-06-14· cited 5×
- In re Tyriq. T.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-08-19
- Dissent - In re Tyriq. T.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-08-19
- Gilmore v. Pawn King, IncSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-09-16
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-09· cited 442×
- Monroe v. MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-03-27· cited 178×
- Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-05-26· cited 170×
- State v. BlaskoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-03-17· cited 95×
- Connecticut National Bank v. RytmanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-05-20· cited 93×
- In re Daniel H.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-06-18· cited 68×
- In re Juvenile Appeal (85-AB)Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-02-26· cited 55×
- Slotnik v. ConsidineSupreme Court· 1998-11-30· cited 53×
- In re Judicial Inquiry No. 85-01Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-04-14· cited 51×
- State v. AudetSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-03-16· cited 38×
- Reliance Insurance v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-07-30· cited 38×
- Goodson v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-12-14· cited 37×
- Goodson v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-02-07· cited 33×
- Colonial Penn Insurance v. BryantSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-07-28· cited 27×
- Edelstein v. Department of Public Health & Addiction ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-04-29· cited 24×
- Stern v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-08-11· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.