Customs and Patent Appeals· 6/30/1978
In re Mead
Citations
- 581 F.2d 251
- 198 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 412
- 1978 CCPA LEXIS 260
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a “conscious choice” not to file a con- tinuing application did not constitute correctible error
- delib-erate, conscious choice not an error amenable to correction by § 251
- “conscious choice” not to file continuing application not “error”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baldwin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Scripps Clinic & Research Foundation v. Genentech, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1991-03-11· cited 106×
- AstraZeneca UK Ltd. v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd.Federal Circuit· 2012-12-14· cited 57×
- In Re Elmar W. Weiler and Richard L. MansellFederal Circuit· 1986-05-08· cited 49×
- Dethmers Manufacturing Co. v. Automatic Equipment Mfg. Co.N.D. Iowa· 1998-09-29· cited 35×
- In Re Godfrey Newbold HounsfieldFederal Circuit· 1983-02-14· cited 30×
- In Re James R. Amos, Chester K. Greathouse and David S. RiddleFederal Circuit· 1991-12-31· cited 23×
- Antares Pharma, Inc. v. Medac Pharma Inc.Federal Circuit· 2014-11-17· cited 20×
- Unnamed caseFederal Circuit· 1991-04-30· cited 14×
- In Re Arnold B. SerenkinFederal Circuit· 2007-03-06· cited 13×
- MBO LABORATORIES, INC. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.Federal Circuit· 2010-04-12· cited 12×
- Inre: DinsmoreFederal Circuit· 2014-06-10· cited 7×
- Principle Business Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1985-02-21· cited 4×
- Hester Industries, Inc. v. Stein, Inc.E.D. Virginia· 1997-05-06· cited 2×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- U. S. Industrial Chemicals, Inc. v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp.Supreme Court· 1942-04-27· cited 111×
- Parker & Whipple Co. v. Yale Clock Co.Supreme Court· 1887-10-31· cited 65×
- Application of George J. Handel, JrCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1963-02-13· cited 25×
- In re OritaCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1977-03-10· cited 14×
- In re RowandCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1975-10-23· cited 13×
- In re MeadCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1978-02-07· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.