In Re Elmar W. Weiler and Richard L. Mansell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that reissue was not permitted where a patentee failed to establish that he had unintentionally omitted subject matter from his original claims
• stating that “not every event or circumstance that can be labeled ‘error’ is correctable by reissue”
• “reissue statute was not enacted ... as a grant to the patentee of a second opportunity to prosecute de novo his original application”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).