E.D. Michigan· 12/14/2011
In Re McLean Wine Co., Inc.
Citations
- 463 B.R. 838
- 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 4994
- 55 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 263
- 2011 WL 6348990
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the court should focus on facts known or that should have been known at critical points during the administration of the case
- surcharge claimant must prove three elements of § 506(c), i.e., reasonableness, necessity, and benefit or, in the alternative, direct or implied consent or expenses were caused
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walter Shapero
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re: Vill. ApothecarySixth Circuit· 2022-08-16· cited 83×
- In re Wolverine, Proctor & Schwartz, LLCD. Massachusetts· 2015-03-27· cited 9×
- In re Hosp. Partners of Am., Inc.D. Delaware· 2019-03-07· cited 7×
- In re PetersonM.D. Tennessee· 2017-04-07· cited 3×
- In re HuffmanS.D. Ohio· 2012-09-28· cited 1×
- In re Tollenaar HolsteinsE.D. California· 2015-10-05· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.