In re: Vill. Apothecary

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Although context matters, most courts read the word ‘include’ to intro- duce a nonexhaustive list.” (citations omitted)
• “Then, and only then, may the court “exercise its discretion” and vary the award based on the same Johnson factors.”
• “[T]he bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion by reducing the law firm’s fees here by 50% based on the minimal results obtained.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named In re: Vill. Apothecary

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• In re: Vill. Apothecary
  Sixth Circuit· 2022-08-16