In re Huffman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that courts “should resist the temptation to engage in 20/20 hindsight and [that it should] focus instead on facts known (or which should have been known) to the applicant at critical points during the pendency of the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hensley v. Eckerhart
  Supreme Court· 1983-05-16· cited 17,202×
• Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1974-01-21· cited 3,561×
• Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air
  Supreme Court· 1986-07-02· cited 1,746×
• Geier v. Sundquist
  Sixth Circuit· 2004-06-18· cited 193×
• In Re Saturley
  D. Maine· 1991-09-06· cited 100×
• In Re Hogue
  S.D. Ohio· 1987-10-08· cited 29×
• In Re Allied Computer Repair, Inc.
  W.D. Kentucky· 1996-10-01· cited 28×
• Jensen v. Froio (In Re Jensen)
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-06-11· cited 24×
• In Re Williams
  E.D. Michigan· 2007-12-04· cited 22×
• Bachman v. Pelofsky (In Re Peterson)
  Eighth Circuit· 2000-08-07· cited 16×
• In Re Phillips
  S.D. Texas· 2003-03-05· cited 16×
• In Re McLean Wine Co., Inc.
  E.D. Michigan· 2011-12-14· cited 14×
• In Re Polishuk
  N.D. Oklahoma· 2001-01-31· cited 11×
• In Re MFlex Corp.
  W.D. Texas· 1994-05-03· cited 10×
• In Re Unitcast, Inc.
  N.D. Ohio· 1997-07-01· cited 9×
• In Re Arnold
  E.D. Michigan· 1993-12-21· cited 7×
• In Re Big Rivers Electric Corp.
  W.D. Kentucky· 2000-08-24· cited 7×
• In Re Kennedy Manufacturing
  N.D. Ohio· 2005-08-23· cited 4×
• In Re Burton
  M.D. Georgia· 2001-06-15· cited 4×