In re McKenzie
Citations
- 142 F. 383
- 73 C.C.A. 483
- 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4115
Syllabus
<p>1. Bankruptcy — Review—Appeal or Petition eor Revision — Widow’s Right oe Dower — Review able Either Way:</p> <p>The grant of jurisdiction to the Circuit Courts of Appeals (Bankr. Act July 1, 1S98, c. 541, § 24a, 30 Stat. 553, U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3431), to review by appeal the final decision of a controversy arising in bankruptcy proceedings of which that court would have had appellate jurisdiction if it had arisen in any other case in a federal court, and' the grant of jurisdiction to revise and superintend in matter of law the proceedings of the inferior courts of bankruptcy (section 24b [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3431]) are not exclusive of each other, but cumulative or concurrent grants, the former of jurisdiction to review questions of law and of fact, the latter of jurisdiction to review questions of law only.</p> <p>An aggrieved party often has a choice of these methods.</p> <p>A decision of a controversy in bankruptcy proceedings which involves a widow’s right of dower in the estate of the bankrupt presents a case of this character, and where no disputed question of fact is in issue this court has jurisdiction to review it by a petition for revision.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — Appeal and review in bankruptcy cases, see note to In re Eggert, 43 C. C. A. 9.]</p> <p>2. Same — Division oe Estate Between Creditors and Bankrupts and Their Families Governed by State Laws.</p> <p>It was the intention of Congress and the public policy embodied in the bankruptcy law to divide the estate of a bankrupt between him, his wife and children on the one hand, and his creditors on the other hand, as the laws of the state of his domicile authorized its division under like circumstances.</p> <p>B. Same — Rights oe Dower — Construction oe § 8a.</p> <p>Bankr. Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, § 8a, 30 Stat. 549 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3425], expressly enacts, and its true interpretation is, that the widow and children of a bankrupt who dies during the pendency of bankruptcy proceedings
Judges: Adams, Sanborn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Central Republic Bank & Trust Co. v. CaldwellEighth Circuit· 1932-04-22· cited 56×
- Thomas v. WoodsEighth Circuit· 1909-09-11· cited 38×
- Kirsner v. TaliaferroFourth Circuit· 1912-12-21· cited 34×
- Hecox v. RollestoneEighth Circuit· 1908-11-07· cited 23×
- In re HaysSixth Circuit· 1910-03-08· cited 18×
- In re HolmesEighth Circuit· 1905-10-25· cited 17×
- United Building & Loan Ass'n v. GarrettW.D. Arkansas· 1946-02-12· cited 16×
- Kelly v. MinorFourth Circuit· 1918-04-02· cited 10×
- In re DicksS.D. Georgia· 1912-06-28· cited 4×
- In re TankersleyE.D. Arkansas· 2017-08-28· cited 2×
- Croggon v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1940-03-04
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dodge v. NorlinEighth Circuit· 1904-11-11· cited 40×
- Porter v. LazearSupreme Court· 1883-10-29· cited 25×
- McClure v. OwensSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1877-11-15· cited 11×
- Crowley v. MellonSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1889-05-15· cited 9×
- Smith v. CapersSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1852-01-15· cited 7×
- In re SeaboltW.D. North Carolina· 1902-02-10· cited 7×
- In re ShaefferE.D. Pennsylvania· 1900-12-18· cited 6×
- In re SlackD. Vermont· 1901-10-29· cited 5×
- Arnett v. ArnettSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1852-01-15· cited 4×
- Crouch v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1889-11-15· cited 2×
- Hawk v. HawkW.D. Arkansas· 1900-06-07· cited 2×
- James v. MarcusSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1857-01-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.