James v. Marcus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff achieved “substantial success” where it prevailed at each critical procedural stage of litigation, won on the merits, and recovered approximately 81% of the damages it sought
• citing, e.g., Dalles Irrigation Dist. v. United States, 91 Fed.Cl. 689, 703-04 (2010) (reducing plaintiff’s attorney fees because plaintiff only prevailed on three of seven total claims
• reviewing prior awards of EAJA-related attorney’s fees and reducing plaintiffs requested fees by 25%
• finding “that the photocopying expenses and court reporter fees at issue are reasonable, were incurred in preparation for, and in conjunction with, the litigation in this court, and would ‘customarily be charged to the client.’”
• finding “that the photocopying expenses and court reporter fees at issue are reasonable, were incurred in preparation for, and in conjunction with, the litigation in this court, and would ‘customarily be charged to the client.’”
• applying prevailing market rates for paralegals in the pertinent local area

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).