Skip to main content
· 11/11/1904

Dodge v. Norlin

Citations

  • 133 F. 363
  • 66 C.C.A. 425
  • 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4421

Syllabus

<p>1. Appellate Jurisdiction — Controversies Arising in Bankruptcy.</p> <p>Section 24a of the bankruptcy law of July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 553 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3431], vests in the Circuit Courts of Appeals appellate jurisdiction over all controversies arising in bankruptcy proceedings over which those courts would have had jurisdiction if those controversies had arisen in the federal cojirts in other cases outside of proceedings in bankruptcy.</p> <p>2. Same — Revocation.</p> <p>This appellate jurisdiction is not excluded or revoked by the provision of section 25a which grants jurisdiction over three specified classes of cases, and limits the time for invoking it to 10 days, nor by section 24b (30 Stat. 553 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3432]), which vests the power of supervision and revision in matter of law in the Court of Appeals. A litigant has the option, in a proper case, to review a decision by appeal or by a petition for revision as matter of law.</p> <p>3. Same — Judgment Avoiding Chattel Mortgage — Right op Appeal.</p> <p>A judgment of a court of bankruptcy that a chattel mortgage upon the alleged property of the bankrupt is voidable by his trustee, that it entitles the mortgagee to no lien upon the property and to no preference in payment out of its proceeds, is a final decision of a controversy arising in bankruptcy proceedings, of which the Circuit Court of Appeals would have had appellate jurisdiction if it had arisen in any other case in a federal court, and the decision may be reviewed by appeal.</p> <p>4. Bankruptcy — Appeal—Practice—Bill op Exceptions.</p> <p>J bill of exceptions has no function and accomplishes no purpose in proceedings in bankruptcy.</p> <p>A proceeding in baiumiptcy is a proceeding in equity.</p> <p>An appeal malees the entire record available to the appellant, and imposes the duty upon him and upon the clerk of the lower court to place the material parts of it in the transcript sent to the appellate court. Teller v. U

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that Rule 9(b) applies to contract-based fraud claims as well as common law fraud claims
  • finding allegation defendants “concealed and/or misrepresented material facts with regard to the claimed loss” during insurance company’s investigation “broad and conclusory,” and, thus, insufficient under Rule 9(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hook, Loch, Ren, Sanborn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.