Skip to main content
· 11/2/1982

Fisher v. Poole

Citations

  • 453 A.2d 408
  • 142 Vt. 162
  • 1982 Vt. LEXIS 619

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a deed does not take effect until it has been delivered to the grantee
  • second element of estoppel requires party being estopped to intend that conduct be acted upon, or acts must be such that party asserting estoppel has right to believe they are so intended
  • real estate seller estopped to assert that disputed right of way was retained by him pursuant to his deed, since just “prior to” execution and delivery of deed, the elements of equitable estoppel were established
  • elements of equitable estoppel and its rationale set forth

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barney, C.J., and Billings, Hill, Underwood and Peck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.