Skip to main content

In re M.B.

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 4334

Syllabus

Juvenile serious youth offender sentence objection privilege R.C. 2317.02(A) invocation hearing confrontation clause testimonial waived criminal proceeding rehabilitated ineffective assistance of counsel amenability mental health journal entry findings R.C. 2152.14(E) sufficient clear and convincing evidence. The trial court did not err by limiting the scope of defense counsel's cross-examination of the state's witness. The trial court's finding that appellant is unlikely to be rehabilitated during the remaining period of the juvenile court's jurisdiction is supported by clear and convincing evidence. The trial court made all necessary findings as required under R.C. 2152.14(E)(1). Appellant was not deprived of his Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel at the invocation hearing.

Judges: Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.