In Re Maynard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that former Superior Court Rule 185 “specifies the timing of a request for alimony in the original divorce proceedings, whereas RSA 458:19 permits a request for alimony to be filed for up to five years after the divorce”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Henry
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2012-01-13· cited 26×
• ATV Watch v. New Hampshire Department of Transportation
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2011-04-26· cited 21×
• New Hampshire Ball Bearings, Inc. v. Jackson
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2009-03-18· cited 19×
• State of New Hampshire v. Shawn Carter
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2014-11-25· cited 8×
• Town of Amherst v. Gilroy
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2008-05-20· cited 7×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Lambert
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2001-12-17· cited 325×
• In Re Hampers
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2006-11-01· cited 79×
• In Re Chamberlin
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2007-02-21· cited 35×
• Bint v. Doe
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2007-02-06· cited 28×
• Bennett v. ITT Hartford Group, Inc.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2004-04-19· cited 19×
• Associated Press v. State
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2005-12-30· cited 19×
• Adams v. Sullivan
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1970-01-30· cited 18×
• In re Harvey
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2006-04-26· cited 15×
• In re Valence
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2002-05-07· cited 12×
• Kenneth T. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-02-16· cited 8×
• Lakeview Homeowners Ass'n v. Moulton Construction, Inc.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1997-04-29· cited 6×
• In re Sutton
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2002-12-17· cited 5×
• City of Spokane v. Ward
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-06-22· cited 2×