Skip to main content

In re Henry

Citations

  • 163 N.H. 175
  • 37 A.3d 320

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that, as the fact finder, the trial court was entitled to accept or reject in whole or in part, the testimony of any witness
  • observing that, as the fact finder, the trial court was entitled to accept or reject, in whole or in part, the testimony of any witness or party
  • as trier of fact, a trial court is entitled to accept, in whole or in part, witness testimony and to disbelieve even uncontroverted evidence
  • “As the fact finder, the trial court was entitled to accept or reject, in whole or in part, the testimony of any witness or party, and was not required to believe even uncontroverted evidence.”
  • trial court may award marital asset in its entirety to one party
  • conflicts in evidence are for the trial court to resolve

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Conboy, Dalianis, Duggan, Hicks, Lynn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.