Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 4/2/2007

In Re: Mathis

Citations

  • 483 F.3d 395
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 7557
  • 2007 WL 958637

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Fifth Circuit has not recognized scientific validity of Flynn effect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Demoss, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named In Re: Mathis

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.