Fifth Circuit· 4/2/2007
In Re: Mathis
Citations
- 483 F.3d 395
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 7557
- 2007 WL 958637
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that Fifth Circuit has not recognized scientific validity of Flynn effect
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, Demoss, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ledford v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification PrisonEleventh Circuit· 2016-03-21· cited 277×
- Mathis v. ThalerFifth Circuit· 2010-08-20· cited 105×
- William Wiley v. Christopher Epps, CommissionerFifth Circuit· 2010-10-27· cited 67×
- Gray v. EppsFifth Circuit· 2010-08-19· cited 57×
- Albarran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2011-07-29· cited 50×
- Thomas v. AllenEleventh Circuit· 2010-05-27· cited 48×
- Ybarra v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2011-03-03· cited 47×
- Maldonado v. ThalerFifth Circuit· 2010-10-29· cited 39×
- Heck Van Tran v. Roland ColsonSixth Circuit· 2014-08-25· cited 34×
- United States v. HardyE.D. Louisiana· 2010-11-24· cited 31×
- Daniel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2011-04-29· cited 31×
- In Re: Eric CatheyFifth Circuit· 2017-05-11· cited 26×
- State v. DunnSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2010-05-11· cited 25×
- Brumfield v. CainFifth Circuit· 2015-12-16· cited 24×
- Robert CampbellFifth Circuit· 2014-05-13· cited 22×
- Thorson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2011-09-15· cited 21×
- Smith v. SchriroNinth Circuit· 2016-02-04· cited 19×
- Wiley v. EppsN.D. Mississippi· 2009-11-05· cited 18×
- Postelle v. CarpenterTenth Circuit· 2018-08-27· cited 14×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2012-05-25· cited 12×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 3,384×
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 2,957×
- Jose Evaristo Reyes-Requena v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 2001-02-28· cited 948×
- Ex Parte BrisenoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-02-11· cited 331×
- Donald Bennett v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1997-03-03· cited 173×
- In Re: WilsonFifth Circuit· 2006-03-16· cited 145×
- In Re: Kenneth Wayne Morris, ApplicantFifth Circuit· 2003-04-15· cited 70×
- In Re: Kia Levoy Johnson, MovantFifth Circuit· 2003-06-10· cited 70×
- Ex Parte SoffarCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-02-11· cited 63×
- In Re: Robert Madrid Salazar, MovantFifth Circuit· 2006-03-17· cited 46×
- In Re: HearnFifth Circuit· 2005-07-20· cited 31×
- In Re: HendersonFifth Circuit· 2006-08-24· cited 24×
- Hearn v. DretkeFifth Circuit· 2004-11-16· cited 21×
- In Re: JohnsonFifth Circuit· 2003-02-25· cited 5×
Other cases named In Re: Mathis
7 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- In Re MathisN.D. Illinois· 2007-05-04· cited 17×
- In Re MathisSupreme Court of Georgia· 2011-04-26· cited 5×
- In re MathisSupreme Court of Georgia· 2015-10-19· cited 5×
- In re MathisCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-02-20· cited 1×
- In Re MathisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1975-06-23
- In re MathisSupreme Court· 2011-06-21
- In re MathisSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2001-01-10
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.