In Re Markham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the purposes and intent underlying § 1322(b)(1) support an interpretation that the language of that section permits co-signed claims to be treated more favorably than other unsecured claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Rosenthal
  C.D. Illinois· 1999-05-06· cited 3×
• In re Russell
  S.D. Ohio· 2013-12-31· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Spokane Railway Credit Union v. Gonzales (In Re Gonzales)
  E.D. Washington· 1994-09-21· cited 34×
• In Re Dornon
  N.D. New York· 1989-05-26· cited 30×
• In Re Perkins
  N.D. Oklahoma· 1985-07-15· cited 25×
• In Re Diaz
  S.D. Ohio· 1989-03-24· cited 12×
• In Re Dondero
  D. Oregon· 1986-03-18· cited 10×
• In Re Davis
  S.D. Ohio· 1989-06-07· cited 7×