In re Russell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding ambiguity because “several courts have found the however clause to be ambiguous” and holding upon review of legislative history that the “however clause permits the preferential treatment of” co-signed claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N. A.
  Supreme Court· 2011-01-11· cited 410×
• Chickasaw Nation v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2001-11-27· cited 405×
• United States v. Enmons
  Supreme Court· 1973-02-22· cited 381×
• United States v. R. L. C.
  Supreme Court· 1992-03-24· cited 179×
• United States v. RLC
  Supreme Court· 1992-03-24· cited 169×
• In Re Iacovoni
  D. Utah· 1980-01-21· cited 124×
• Public Finance Corporation v. Eddie and Angela Freeman
  Fifth Circuit· 1983-08-19· cited 83×
• Nelson v. Easley (In Re Easley)
  M.D. Tennessee· 1987-05-01· cited 79×
• Baud v. Carroll
  Fifth Circuit· 2011-02-04· cited 69×
• Bentley v. Boyajian (In Re Bentley)
  First Circuit· 2001-09-05· cited 63×
• In Re Kovich
  W.D. Michigan· 1980-06-09· cited 52×
• Meyer v. Hill (In Re Hill)
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-09-28· cited 50×
• Spokane Railway Credit Union v. Gonzales (In Re Gonzales)
  E.D. Washington· 1994-09-21· cited 34×
• In Re Dornon
  N.D. New York· 1989-05-26· cited 30×
• Ramirez v. Bracher
  Fifth Circuit· 2000-02-18· cited 28×
• In Re Montano
  District of Columbia· 1980-06-02· cited 28×
• In Re Todd
  N.D. Illinois· 1986-09-25· cited 28×
• In Re Perkins
  N.D. Oklahoma· 1985-07-15· cited 25×
• In Re Riggel
  S.D. Ohio· 1992-04-03· cited 24×
• In Re McNichols
  N.D. Illinois· 2000-05-25· cited 24×