Spokane Railway Credit Union v. Gonzales (In Re Gonzales)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that preferential treatment of co-signed claim was unfair when debtor co-signed debt for the benefit of the codebtor
• holding that preferential treatment of co-signed claim was unfair when debtor co-signed debt for the benefit of the codebtor
• holding that preferential treatment 19 of co-signed claim was unfair when debtor co-signed debt for the benefit of the codebtor
• holding that preferential treatment of cosigned claim was unfair when debtor cosigned debt for the benefit of the codebt- or
• stating that by confirming plan, court “implicitly overruled” creditors’ objection to plan
• stating that by confirming plan, court “implicitly overruled” creditors’ objection to plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).