Skip to main content

In re M.A.L.

Citations

  • 334 Mont. 436
  • 2006 MT 299
  • 148 P.3d 606
  • 2006 Mont. LEXIS 609

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing retroactive application of TPR provision, noting that in a TPR proceeding “the best interests of the child are of paramount concern and take precedence over the rights of the parent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leaphart, Morris, Nelson, Rice, Warner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.