Montana Supreme Court· 11/7/1997

Nelson v. Driscoll

Citations

948 P.2d 256
285 Mont. 355
54 State Rptr. 1190
1997 Mont. LEXIS 239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

a Rule 59(g) motion cannot be used as a vehicle to raise an issue that was already raised, or should have been raised, earlier in the proceedings
a motion to alter or amend is properly filed to, among other things, “correct manifest errors of law or fact upon which the judgment was based”
a file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/97-310%20&%2097-311%20Opinion.htm (16 of 21)4/19/2007 3:03:34 PM Nos motion to alter or amend is properly filed to, among other things, \correct manifest errors of law or fact upon which the judgment was based\
a file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/cu1046/Desktop/opinions/97-310%20Opinion.htm (16 of 21)4/19/2007 2:59:46 PM Nos motion to alter or amend is properly filed to, among other things, \correct manifest errors of law or fact upon which the judgment was based\
A motion for reconsideration does not exist under Montana law.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trieweiler, Turnage, Nelson, Gray, Leaphart, Regnier, Hunt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.