In Re Quigley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• analyzing and rejecting seven reasons advanced by various courts as to why the Chapter 7 application of Section 707(b) (2)(A)(iii)(I) should be different in Chapter 13
• relying on Section 101(10A) which includes in “current monthly income” “any amount paid by any entity other than the debtor ... on a regular basis for the household expenses of the debtor____”
• “scheduled as contractually due” means payments owed to secured creditors as of the petition date
• “Importantly, § 1325(b)(3) directs that the expenses for an above the median income Chapter 13 debtor ‘shall be determined in accordance with’ § 707(b)(2).... [Section] 707(b)(2)(A)(iii)(I) makes no provision for a debtor’s anticipated changes in expenses.”
• § 1325(b)(3) does not alter the language or the application of § 707(b)(2)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hildebrand v. Thomas (In Re Thomas)
  Sixth Circuit· 2008-10-31· cited 20×
• American Express Bank, FSB v. Smith (In Re Smith)
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-10-05· cited 17×
• In Re Ralston
  M.D. Florida· 2009-02-10· cited 15×
• In Re Rahman
  E.D. New York· 2009-01-23· cited 12×
• Yarnall v. Martinez (In Re Martinez)
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-10-05· cited 12×
• In Re Willette
  D. Vermont· 2008-10-17· cited 9×
• In Re James
  S.D. Georgia· 2008-09-05· cited 9×
• In Re Burbank
  D. Rhode Island· 2009-02-24· cited 9×
• In Re Smith
  W.D. Washington· 2008-11-14· cited 7×
• In Re Hoss
  D. Kansas· 2008-08-20· cited 6×
• In Re Mendelson
  E.D. New York· 2009-03-12· cited 5×
• In Re Dionne
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2009-04-15· cited 1×
• In Re Stenstrom
  C.D. Illinois· 2010-03-25· cited 1×
• In re: Gordon Thomas, Jr. v.
  Sixth Circuit· 2008-10-31
• Chittim v. Chittim
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-11-29

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
• Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca
  Supreme Court· 1987-03-09· cited 4,149×
• Lamie v. United States Trustee
  Supreme Court· 2004-01-26· cited 1,956×
• Till v. SCS Credit Corp.
  Supreme Court· 2004-05-17· cited 381×
• Edmond v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1997-05-19· cited 345×
• In Re Hardacre
  N.D. Texas· 2006-03-06· cited 214×
• In Re: Sunterra Corporation, Debtor. Rci Technology Corporation, Formerly Known as Resort Computer Corporation v. Sunterra Corporation
  Fourth Circuit· 2004-03-18· cited 97×
• In Re Nockerts
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2006-12-14· cited 80×
• In Re Skaggs, Richard & Connie
  E.D. Missouri· 2006-08-16· cited 57×
• In Re Sorrell
  S.D. Ohio· 2007-01-26· cited 54×
• In Re Randle
  N.D. Illinois· 2006-12-19· cited 53×
• In Re McGillis
  W.D. Michigan· 2007-05-15· cited 52×
• Fokkena v. Hartwick
  D. Minnesota· 2007-08-20· cited 46×
• Beskin v. McPherson (In Re McPherson)
  W.D. Virginia· 2006-07-31· cited 41×
• In Re Love
  M.D. Alabama· 2006-08-30· cited 32×
• In Re Van Bodegom Smith
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2008-03-06· cited 31×
• United States v. Alfano
  E.D. New York· 1999-01-25· cited 31×
• In Re Hayes
  D. Massachusetts· 2007-09-26· cited 29×
• Stapleton v. Mundy (In Re Mundy)
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-03-01· cited 28×
• In Re Burmeister
  N.D. Illinois· 2007-11-16· cited 24×