Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/9/2020

In re L.L.

Citations

2020 Ohio 5609

Syllabus

CHILDREN – CUSTODY – R.C. 3109.04 – BEST INTEREST: The juvenile court properly applied the best-interest factors under R.C. 3109.04 and did not abuse its discretion in determining that it was in the best interest of the child for father to be her legal custodian because father was more likely to honor and facilitate parenting rights and visitation.

Judges: Zayas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

In re Z.C.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-24· cited 7×
Saylers v. Salyers
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-05-05· cited 2×
Collier v. Smith
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-10· cited 1×
In re D.K.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-17· cited 1×
In re M. Children
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-10-15· cited 1×
In re P.W.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-04-24

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Davis v. Flickinger
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-02-12· cited 1,567×
Bechtol v. Bechtol
Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-02-14· cited 384×
In re M.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-04-19· cited 22×
In re V.B.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-06-19· cited 3×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.