In re P.W.

Citations

• 2026 Ohio 1478

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting legal custody of a minor child to appellee-father. The trial court applied the statutory factors in R.C. 3109.04(F)(1) and rendered a soundly reasoned decision. Even though appellant-mother had been the child's primary caregiver, that consideration alone is not dispositive of the best interest of the child analysis. The evidence indicated that the child had adjusted well to father's home and visits, bonded with father and his wife, and was involved in the community where father lived. The evidence supported the trial court's finding that father was more likely to honor and facilitate parenting-time and visitations with mother. While mother had performed well on her case plan objectives, compliance with a case plan is not dispositive or focused on the best interests of the child. Judgment affirmed.