In re D.K.
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 4148
Syllabus
LEGAL CUSTODY – ABUSE OF DISCRETION – JUV.R. 40 – INDEPENDENT REVIEW – AFFIDAVIT TO SUPPLEMENT AN INCOMPLETE TRANSCRIPT – RECORDING ERROR – DUE PROCESS – BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD – APP.R. 12(B): The juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in in conducting its independent review of the magistrate's decision where Juv.R. 40(D)(4)(b) expressly authorizes the juvenile court to adopt the magistrate's findings in their entirety and the juvenile court added additional reasoning in its decision to respond to mother's objections. The juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in conducting its independent review by relying on an affidavit of testimony that was presented to the magistrate but not transcribed because of an error where Juv.R. 40(D)(4)(b) expressly authorizes the juvenile court to take additional evidence when acting on objections to a magistrate's decision. The juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in conducting its independent review by deferring to the magistrate's findings of witness credibility, despite taking an affidavit, because the affidavit contained mother's testimony originally presented to the magistrate. The juvenile court did not err when it ordered mother to submit an affidavit of the evidence that was presented at the hearing before the magistrate but not transcribed because of a recording error where Juv.R. 40(D) permits an affidavit to supplement a transcript where parts of that transcript are unavailable. The juvenile court did not violate mother's procedural-due-process rights by ordering mother to submit an affidavit where an affidavit is a proper cure for a recording error and mother gained the benefit of submitting a 48-page affidavit of testimony without opposing counsel to potentially object or cross-examine mother. The juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in making its best-interest determination where its judgment addresses all statutory best-interest factors and supports each determination with competent and credi
Judges: Winkler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- Davis v. FlickingerOhio Supreme Court· 1997-02-12· cited 1,567×
- Miller v. MillerOhio Supreme Court· 1988-06-01· cited 1,173×
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
- State v. MorrisOhio Supreme Court· 2012-06-05· cited 478×
- Hal Artz Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1986-12-19· cited 241×
- Blair v. McDonaghOhio Court of Appeals· 2008-07-25· cited 59×
- State v. CarsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-06· cited 37×
- State ex rel. Dewine v. AshworthOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-29· cited 26×
- In re M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-04-19· cited 22×
- In re F.B.D.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-26· cited 17×
- State v. A.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-28· cited 17×
- In re A.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-14· cited 13×
- In re S.D.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-18· cited 13×
- Kane v. HardinOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-10-25· cited 12×
- In re M.W. ChildrenOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-03-20· cited 10×
- In re E.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-27· cited 6×
- In re D.Z.F.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-11-10· cited 6×
- In re L.L.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-09· cited 6×
- In re C & M ChildrenOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-26· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.