E.D. Pennsylvania· 8/27/2004
In re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation
Citations
- 223 F.R.D. 335
- 2004 WL 1909722
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- tolling permitted in separate class action brought by members who opted out of initial class action and who also brought new state law claims
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dubois
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cowles v. Bank WestMichigan Supreme Court· 2006-07-27· cited 63×
- In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust LitigationN.D. California· 2007-06-01· cited 61×
- Stevens v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Montana Supreme Court· 2010-12-30· cited 60×
- In Re Packaged Ice Antitrust LitigationE.D. Michigan· 2011-03-11· cited 52×
- In Re Enron Corporation SecuritiesS.D. Texas· 2006-12-08· cited 26×
- In Re Urethane Antitrust LitigationD. Kansas· 2009-08-14· cited 19×
- Asplundh Tree Expert Co. v. AbshireCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2017-03-24· cited 13×
- In Re Linerboard Antitrust LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-07-28· cited 10×
- Supreme Auto Transport LLC v. Arcelor MittalN.D. Illinois· 2017-03-03· cited 9×
- Adedje v. Westat, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-09-06· cited 9×
- Newby v. Enron Corp.S.D. Texas· 2006-12-08· cited 9×
- In Re Community Bank of Northern VirginiaW.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-10-09· cited 8×
- In Re Linerboard Antitrust LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-08-30· cited 7×
- In Re Linerboard Antitrust LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-07-30· cited 6×
- Tobias Bermudez Chavez v. Occidental Chemical Corp.Second Circuit· 2019-08-07· cited 6×
- Tech Data Corp. v. Hitachi, Ltd.N.D. California· 2014-03-13· cited 5×
- Town of Princeton v. Monsanto Co., SolutiaD. Massachusetts· 2016-08-10· cited 5×
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Stone Container Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-07-28· cited 1×
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Stone Container Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-07-30· cited 1×
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Stone Container Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-08-30· cited 1×
Cites
74 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court· 1984-05-22· cited 5,292×
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court· 1969-06-09· cited 2,928×
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court· 1974-02-25· cited 2,015×
- Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court· 1983-06-13· cited 967×
- Eric Robinson v. Philip L. Johnson the District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania, Mike FisherThird Circuit· 2002-11-18· cited 718×
- Bayberry Associates v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court· 1990-01-22· cited 418×
- Meighan v. U.S. Sprint Communications Co.Tennessee Supreme Court· 1996-04-29· cited 329×
- Ala, Inc. v. Ccair, Inc.Third Circuit· 1994-07-07· cited 302×
- Chardon v. Fumero SotoSupreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 275×
- Janney Montgomery Scott, Inc. v. Shepard Niles, Inc.Third Circuit· 1993-12-08· cited 217×
- Philip Morris Inc. v. AngelettiCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-05-16· cited 212×
- Hecht v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-01-11· cited 149×
- McCroskey v. Bryant Air Conditioning CompanyTennessee Supreme Court· 1975-04-07· cited 148×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 2002-09-05· cited 138×
- Institute for Scientific Information, Inc. v. Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers, Inc. Scientific Technical Book Service, LtdThird Circuit· 1991-05-20· cited 134×
- Wehling v. Citizens National BankIndiana Supreme Court· 1992-02-14· cited 133×
- Robert Hanna v. United States of America Veterans' Administration HospitalThird Circuit· 1975-04-18· cited 128×
- Dean v. Ruscon Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-03-25· cited 106×
- Foster v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court· 1982-05-17· cited 99×
- Rosenthal v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado· 1995-12-18· cited 93×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.