Ohio Supreme Court· 4/28/2026
In re L.E.S.
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 1449
Syllabus
Domestic relations—Parentage—R.C. 3111.95(A), which provides an avenue for the consenting spouse of a woman who conceives a child through artificial insemination to be recognized as the natural parent of the child, does not apply to same-sex couples who were not married at time of insemination—Court of appeals' judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Judges: DeWine, J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Greenlaw v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2008-06-23· cited 1,032×
- Obergefell v. HodgesSupreme Court· 2015-06-26· cited 955×
- Goodridge v. Department of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2003-11-18· cited 186×
- Kalish v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1977-05-11· cited 73×
- Perry v. SchwarzeneggerN.D. California· 2010-08-04· cited 67×
- Nestor v. NestorOhio Supreme Court· 1984-12-31· cited 58×
- Pavan v. SmithSupreme Court· 2017-06-26· cited 52×
- Rowell v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 2012-09-26· cited 32×
- Garden State Equality v. DowNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2013-09-27· cited 19×
- In re L.E.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-01-19· cited 6×
- Leibrock v. LeibrockButler County Court of Common Pleas· 1952-05-05· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.