In re L.E.S.

Citations

• 2024 Ohio 165

Syllabus

PARENTAGE — CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CIVIL — DUE PROCESS — EQUAL PROTECTION — R.C. 3111.95(A) — MARRIAGE: The trial court erred in failing to consider whether the parties would have been married at the time of the child(ren)'s conception—absent Ohio's unconstitutional ban on same-sex marriage— before finding that the same-sex consenting partner of a woman subject to nonspousal artificial insemination could not be recognized as a legal parent of the child(ren) under Ohio law.