Skip to main content
N.D. Ohio· 12/16/1983

In Re Lee

Citations

  • 35 B.R. 663
  • 1983 Bankr. LEXIS 4832
  • 11 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 337

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • PIK payments are substitutes for crops debtor would have planted thus proceeds of debtor’s crop
  • case wrongly decided in that debtors completed performance postpetition, see id. at 338

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harold F. White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.