N.D. Iowa· 1/15/1992
In Re Allen
Citations
- 135 B.R. 856
- 26 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 767
- 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 62
- 22 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 829
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating Bildisco language is unambiguous and was intended to put a stop to the distinction between the debtor and debtor-in-possession
- stating Bildisco language is unambiguous and was intended to put a stop to the distinction between the debtor and debtor-in-possession
- stating Bildisco language is unambiguous and was intended to put a stop to the distinction between the debtor and debtor-in-possession
- following NLRB v. Bildisco & Bildisco, 465 U.S. 513, 104 S.Ct. 1188, 79 L.Ed.2d 482 (1984)
- following NLRB v. Bildisco & Bildisco, 465 U.S. 513, 104 S.Ct. 1188, 79 L.Ed.2d 482 (1984)
- government entitled to setoff debtor’s price support loan obligation against government’s obligation to debtor under CRP agreement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Michael J. Melloy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States of America, Acting Through the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service v. Willis R. GerthEighth Circuit· 1993-04-29· cited 88×
- Farmers Home Administration v. Buckner (In Re Buckner)Tenth Circuit· 1998-03-05· cited 13×
- In Re GehrkeN.D. Iowa· 1993-05-07· cited 11×
- In Re BucknerD. Kansas· 1994-03-16· cited 7×
- DiSalvo v. DiSalvo (In Re DiSalvo)Ninth Circuit· 1998-06-11· cited 1×
- United States ex rel. Agricultural Stabilization & Conservation Service v. GerthEighth Circuit· 1993-04-29
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & BildiscoSupreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 1,085×
- United States of America on Behalf of Its Agency Internal Revenue Service v. William H. Norton, Carrie W. Norton, F/k/a Carrie A. WoodwardThird Circuit· 1983-09-12· cited 249×
- In Re Southern Industrial Banking Corporation, Debtor. Thomas Duvoisin, Liquidating Trustee, and Bank of Commerce, Intervening v. Emmett J. FosterSixth Circuit· 1987-01-22· cited 149×
- Unnamed caseFifth Circuit· 1987-04-20· cited 103×
- In Re Applied Logic Corporation, Bankrupt. New Jersey National Bank v. Daniel Gutterman, as Trustee of Applied Logic Corporation, BankruptSecond Circuit· 1978-04-27· cited 73×
- Mosebach v. BlytheCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 1979-06-28· cited 61×
- In the Matter of Steelship Corporation, Bankrupt. Vilas and Sommer Inc. v. Emon Mahony, Jr., TrusteeEighth Circuit· 1978-05-16· cited 45×
- Mohawk Industries Inc. v. United States (In Re Mohawk Industries, Inc.)D. Massachusetts· 1987-06-05· cited 45×
- Massachusetts v. Dartmouth House Nursing Home, Inc. (In Re Dartmouth House Nursing Home, Inc.)D. Massachusetts· 1982-09-30· cited 41×
- Khabbaz v. SwartzSupreme Court of Iowa· 1982-05-19· cited 41×
- Greseth v. Federal Land Bank (In Re Greseth)D. Minnesota· 1987-10-16· cited 40×
- In Re LeeN.D. Ohio· 1983-12-16· cited 35×
- Blanton v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. (In Re Blanton)E.D. Virginia· 1989-05-30· cited 34×
- Walat Farms, Inc. v. United States (In Re Walat Farms, Inc.)E.D. Michigan· 1987-01-27· cited 33×
- HL Munn Lumber Company v. City of AmesSupreme Court of Iowa· 1970-05-07· cited 27×
- Matter of Nickerson & Nickerson, Inc.D. Nebraska· 1986-02-25· cited 27×
- Loras College v. Iowa Civil Rights CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa· 1979-11-14· cited 27×
- Moratzka v. United States, Agricultural Stabilization & Conservation Service (In re Matthieson)D. Minnesota· 1986-07-07· cited 26×
- Homan v. Kemba Cincinnati Credit Union (In Re Homan)S.D. Ohio· 1990-06-22· cited 24×
- Decker v. JuzwikSupreme Court of Iowa· 1963-05-07· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.